tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11218059.post112096146414870746..comments2023-04-29T03:24:45.969-07:00Comments on SFU English 369: Chick-Lit & Lad-Lit: "Literary Bonbons"Dr. Stephen Ogdenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16765689515656935339noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11218059.post-1121612215299297862005-07-17T07:56:00.001-07:002005-07-17T07:56:00.001-07:00Also, I know the article talks about post-feminism...Also, I know the article talks about post-feminism, but what is that? I, too, found an article I like but then read that it is written by a feminist. Don't get me wrong, I'm not against feminism any more than I am against masculinism. But is there not a way of reading that is neither of these ways and at the same time does justice to the text? Maybe post-feminism is it if I knew what it was.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11218059.post-1121612214586720742005-07-17T07:56:00.000-07:002005-07-17T07:56:00.000-07:00Also, I know the article talks about post-feminism...Also, I know the article talks about post-feminism, but what is that? I, too, found an article I like but then read that it is written by a feminist. Don't get me wrong, I'm not against feminism any more than I am against masculinism. But is there not a way of reading that is neither of these ways and at the same time does justice to the text? Maybe post-feminism is it if I knew what it was.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11218059.post-1121607458131086572005-07-17T06:37:00.000-07:002005-07-17T06:37:00.000-07:00Great article. Thanks KristenGreat article. Thanks KristenAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11218059.post-1121092042198361832005-07-11T07:27:00.000-07:002005-07-11T07:27:00.000-07:00The article seems to say that Chick Lit is not "li...The article seems to say that Chick Lit is not "literature".Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com